Recently, I had a couple of experiences stick out in my mind that made me think I should blog about some "fancy editors". I've referenced them in a couple of my sessions, used SublimeText heavily in the past, and I've always been one willing to try out new things. The fact of the matter is, especially when a thing costs nothing to use, you may as well try and broaden your tool set.
There are plenty of "fancy editors" to choose from. The fact of the matter is that we live in a post-Notepad++ world, as far as strong text editors (but short of full-blown IDEs) go. The advantage of not going "full IDE" is to, in theory, remain more flexible and fast. These fancy editors are becoming far more configurable as they progress, so I would also argue that the grey area in which these reside has only malleable barriers separating them from "IDEs" and text editors.
The main contenders I see, at the moment, in no particular order, are:
The last two are slightly more editors in the direction of IDEs, but they're definitely worthy of considering. Also of note*, SublimeText and WebStorm IDE are paid-for applications, though SublimeText 3 is free while it's in beta (which it has been for some time), with gentle periodic reminders suggesting a license purchase.
Why I Like SublimeText
A while back, I ponied up the cash for a personal developer license for SublimeText. At the time (when v3 came out), it was the right decision, as it was getting pretty good after version 2 matured, along with a pretty strong integration of a package manager, a strong layout for content and file tree, things like code maps, and fancy features like multiline editing and more. If you check out their homepage, there's an animated GIF demonstrating some of the more powerful features, and it still is impressive.
I still think SublimeText is a great editor, but having heard good things about multiple others start cropping up, I thought it was worth checkout some of the others out there. I moved on to Atom for a variety of reasons, but I've heard good things about both VS Code and WebStorm IDE.
Why I Like Atom
It's not that it's made by GitHub, built on top of Node with Electron, though those are all interesting aspects. The largest appeal of Atom is that it has nearly everything I like about SublimeText either as built-in or available as an installable package. It's extensible to the core, exposed mostly via a personal config interface, so if you can write JS, you can extend your own editor. There are a fair amount of packages (plugins) and themes to keep people busy. A couple of the more notable packages I have installed are:
- sync-settings, to sync my Atom settings between installs
- git-timemachine, to view git history of a file
- terminal-plus, to use my terminal from within Atom (handy for full-screen working)
- timecop, to keep track of how long Atom is taking to load (so I can remove some of the packages/themes I was overly zealous about installing the first time around)
Atom is free and worth trying out, especially if you haven't ventured too far out there yet.
VS Code is something I attribute to the "New" Microsoft, which plays to its strengths, doesn't bash Linux, and tries to be relevant through sheer effort; which seems to be working out pretty well. The MS team has open source released an increasing number of projects, of late, not the least of which is TypeScript (I'm a big fan, though still adopting). VS Code seeks to reconcile the needs of modern development tooling with things like .NET dev, git, and things like Node, Sass and LESS, amongst others. If you want to know more about Why VS Code, their page of the same name gives their explanation. My little bit of playing with it is promising. Strangely enough, VS Code is also built on Electron (or not so strange, as the case may be).
A (Non-Standard) Use Case
A quick tip, regarding "fancy" text editors, since everything is configurable, everything is configurable. I recently had the
fun opportunity to read through a fair number of NSDs from a Domino server. I won't get into the specifics of the cause, but reading through NSDs can be a little rough, even if you know what your looking for and the layout of such a file. Enter a "fancy" editor to the rescue! Realizing some similarities in the data structure, enough anyway to be "close enough" to help me read through it all, I chose to change my language syntax highlighting to force my editor (shown below in SublimeText) to tread my NSD logs as YAML. YAML is a "human readable data serialization language", think of it as a superset of JSON, built for ruby; for a crash course, check out the page for YAML on learn x in y minutes. The text blocks looked similar enough and forcing the syntax highlighting helped me keep things from swimming on my screen as I scrolled through several files.
Note: most of these "fancy editors" make an effort at guessing the correct language to use, often by file extension, and put a notifier or change action in the lower right corner (by my experience); Notepad++ has its "Language" menu as well.
Before Language Syntax Highlighting
I tried to blur the names to protect any innocent servers.
After Language Syntax Highlighting
All in all, I think I achieved my goal in that use case; to better be able to read my log files. I'll be continuing my trend of getting more used to Atom, although that become pretty familiar after just over a week of hard use. I think for any major MS related work, I'll probably switch over to VS Code for a while, just to give it a fair go as well. In the end, a tool is a tool, especially if you've suffered in the past. Eclipse is often too "heavy" for any front-end or Node work I do, so having something more flexible, immediate, and integrated to that side of things is great. 🍻